Keep the map in your transcriptome.
Dissociated single-cell RNA-seq answers "which cells are present" but throws away the tissue architecture that defines biology — immune niches, tumour margins, developmental gradients. Spatial transcriptome sequencing measures gene expression across intact tissue sections, keeping every expression measurement anchored to its physical location.
Spatial Transcriptome Sequencing at Nucleome Informatics
Spatial transcriptome sequencing captures gene expression across an intact tissue section while recording the two-dimensional position of every measurement. Nucleome Informatics offers the 10x Genomics Visium platform family:
- Spatially-resolved gene expression matrix with tissue coordinates and image registration
- H&E image (FFPE/CytAssist workflows) aligned to expression data
- Clustering and spatial domain identification (Seurat/Scanpy; Squidpy/Giotto)
- Cell-type deconvolution of spots using a single-cell reference (RCTD, cell2location, or Tangram)
- Spatially-aware differential expression and ligand–receptor interaction analysis (COMMOT/MISTy)
- Publication-ready figures: spatial feature plots, domain maps, interaction networks
Why spatial matters
- Architecture is biology: tumour margins, immune niches, and epithelial–stromal interfaces are spatial phenomena invisible to dissociated methods.
- FFPE archives unlock: CytAssist brings spatial transcriptomics to retrospective cohorts with clinical annotation and follow-up data.
- Morphology + expression: H&E and expression data are co-registered, letting pathologist annotation guide molecular analysis.
From first principles to expert-level analysis
New here? Start with Foundations. Planning a study or reviewing results? Jump to Practitioner or Expert. Each level builds on the one before it, so you can read this page as a short course or dip in where you need to.
Start here if you are new to this service — six ideas that explain what it is and why it matters.
What is spatial transcriptomics?
A method that measures gene expression across a tissue section while keeping the physical position of every measurement — a molecular map layered on the tissue image.
How is it different from single-cell RNA-seq?
scRNA-seq dissociates the tissue first, losing location. Spatial methods keep the tissue intact. Spot-based methods measure groups of cells per spot; imaging-based methods measure defined gene panels per cell.
What tissue types work?
Fresh-frozen tissue works with standard Visium; FFPE tissue (the most common pathology archive format) works with CytAssist. Both deliver whole-transcriptome data.
What is a "spot"?
The unit of capture — a barcoded area on the slide that collects mRNA from the cells above it. Each spot may contain one to several cells; deconvolution estimates the cell-type mix per spot.
What does the output look like?
A gene-by-spot expression matrix with coordinates, plus the tissue image. Analysis reveals clusters of similar expression ("spatial domains") that often correspond to anatomical structures.
What samples do I send?
Fixed or frozen tissue blocks or sections. Section quality (RNA integrity, morphology) is the main determinant of success — we provide guidance and QC before sequencing.
For scientists planning a project or reading a report: how each step works and how it can mislead.
Tissue preparation
Fresh-frozen sections are placed on capture slides and fixed/permeabilised on-slide. FFPE sections are H&E-stained, imaged, and processed through CytAssist, which transfers released mRNA to the capture slide beneath.
Library construction and sequencing
Captured mRNA is reverse-transcribed with spatial barcodes, library-constructed, and sequenced on Illumina instruments (NovaSeq 6000/X). Depth requirements depend on tissue complexity and analysis goals.
Alignment and counting
Space Ranger aligns reads, assigns UMIs to spots, and registers the tissue image. Outputs include the filtered/unfiltered matrices and image alignments.
Clustering and spatial domains
Standard scRNA-style clustering (Seurat/Scanpy) identifies transcriptional states; spatial statistics (Squidpy/Giotto) detect spatially coherent domains and neighbourhood relationships.
Deconvolution
Spot-level mixtures are resolved with reference-based methods (RCTD, cell2location) or reference-free approaches where a good single-cell atlas is unavailable — with honest caveats about deconvolution accuracy.
Ligand–receptor and neighbourhood analysis
COMMOT/MISTy-style analyses infer cell–cell communication from spatial co-localisation of ligand and receptor expression — the layer that makes spatial data mechanistically interpretable.
For study design: the decisions that determine whether the data answers your question.
Resolution vs coverage trade-offs
Spot-level Visium maximises transcriptome breadth; high-resolution configurations trade cost and throughput for finer spatial detail. Define the biological question first, then choose.
Reference atlas quality
Deconvolution is only as good as the single-cell reference. Where none exists, consider generating a matched scRNA-seq reference from adjacent tissue — we can run both.
Batch and slide effects
Tissue sections processed on different slides carry batch effects. Randomise conditions across slides, include replicate sections, and plan for integration analysis (Harmony/Seurat integration adapted for spatial data).
FFPE RNA quality
FFPE blocks vary in RNA quality. We QC sections before committing to full runs and report degradation metrics honestly.
Longitudinal and multi-section designs
Serial sections enable 3D reconstruction and multi-omics layering (spatial transcriptomics + matched scRNA-seq + bulk omics on the same specimen).
Reporting standards
We document capture chemistry, slide lot, alignment parameters, and analysis versions — following emerging spatial-omics reporting norms (e.g. STorms-style checklists).
- Spot
- the barcoded capture area on a Visium slide.
- CytAssist
- 10x instrument transferring mRNA from an FFPE section to a capture slide.
- Spatial domain
- a contiguous tissue region with coherent expression identity.
- Deconvolution
- estimating per-spot cell-type composition from expression.
- UMI
- unique molecular identifier; enables molecule counting.
- H&E
- haematoxylin and eosin; the standard pathology tissue stain.
How it works, in two figures
The Visium platform and CytAssist workflows are described in 10x Genomics technical notes; spatial domain detection, deconvolution, and interaction-inference methods are established in the primary literature (RCTD, cell2location, Tangram, COMMOT, MISTy). See references below.
Built for the questions you are asking
The platforms, pipelines and standards behind this service.
10x Visium capture slides
Thousands of barcoded capture spots (~55 µm) arrayed across the tissue section, each measuring the whole transcriptome above it.
CytAssist for FFPE
Transfers mRNA from a standard glass-slide FFPE section to the capture slide — compatible with routine pathology archives and standard H&E staining.
Whole-transcriptome assays
No pre-selected gene panel: the full transcriptome is measured, enabling unbiased discovery and post-hoc focus on any gene.
Image–expression co-registration
H&E morphology is aligned to the expression matrix, supporting pathologist-guided region analysis.
Squidpy / Giotto spatial analysis
Spatial statistics (Moran's I, neighbourhood enrichment), spatial domain detection, and tissue-graph analyses beyond standard clustering.
Deconvolution and interaction mapping
RCTD/cell2location/Tangram deconvolve spot-level data with single-cell references; COMMOT/MISTy infer spatial ligand–receptor communication. ---
What this service does and does not cover
Service highlights
What you can expect from our team in Hyderabad.
FFPE-compatible
CytAssist workflows open pathology archives to spatial transcriptomics.
Whole transcriptome
No gene-panel bias — discover first, focus later.
Full analysis stack
Seurat, Scanpy, Squidpy, Giotto, RCTD, cell2location, COMMOT — analysis included, not optional.
Morphology co-registered
H&E images aligned to expression for pathologist-guided analysis.
India-based, end-to-end
From tissue QC to publication figures in one Hyderabad laboratory.
Consultative design
Platform and resolution chosen for your question, with honest trade-off discussion. ---
Frequently asked, in plain language
From the basics to the finer points of design and interpretation.
basicWhat is the difference between Visium and imaging-based spatial methods?
basicCan I use FFPE tissue?
basicHow much tissue do I need?
intermediateHow is the data analysed?
intermediateCan you deconvolve spots into cell types?
intermediateWhat sequencing depth is required?
advancedCan I do 3D reconstruction from serial sections?
advancedHow do I handle batch effects across slides?
advancedCan spatial data be integrated with scRNA-seq and bulk omics?
advancedWhat are the limitations of deconvolution?
Key literature & resources
Selected sources behind the methods and reference values on this page. Figures labelled "schematic" or "illustrative" are generated for this page, not client data.
- Ståhl PL, et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science. 2016;353(6294):66–71.
- 10x Genomics. Visium and CytAssist technical notes and user guides. 10x Genomics documentation, 2022–2025.
- Cable DM, et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics (RCTD). Nature Biotechnology. 2022;40(4):517–526.
- Kleshchevnikov V, et al. Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology. 2022;40(5):661–671.
- Biancalani T, et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nature Methods. 2021;18(11):1462–1470.
- Longo SK, et al. Integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to elucidate intercellular tissue dynamics (MISTy). Nature Reviews Genetics. 2021;22(10):627–644.
- Cang Z, et al. Screening cell–cell communication in spatial transcriptomics via collective optimal transport (COMMOT). Nature Methods. 2023;20(2):218–228.
- Marconato L, et al. Spatially resolved transcriptomics: challenges and perspectives. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2025 (spatial data analysis benchmarks, Squidpy: Palla G, et al. Nature Methods. 2022;19(2):171–178).









